论文审了一个半月，就只有一个审稿人，编辑给的意见是个小修。但是不太好处理这个问题，请各位前辈帮我参谋参谋！
Yes, all the conclusions are totally right, that is undisputed. But the logic of this is a little mumble disconnected, and cannot hang together. I think the focus of the logic is that from the design, they found different relationship between molybdenum equivalent and length and width of α would lead different properties. And the experiments with different length and width of α would verify this. So the method of the design should be successful.
审稿人觉得两部分工作的逻辑联系不是很紧密，其实也确实是这样，但是由于篇幅太长了，这个文章里我们略过了这个比较，但是在另一篇正在撰写的文章中进行了这个比较，
我该怎么处理这个情况比较好？ 返回小木虫查看更多