请各位好心人帮帮傻孩子吧~编辑返回了评审的修改意见，但是有2条看不懂........请大家帮帮我，帮我分析一下下面这2条是什么意思，好吗~感谢感谢！
1. It is normally good to give the full name of the abbreviations/symbols when first used- despite them appearing in Abbreviations list. Also, in this part authors must present variables, binary variables, and parameters.
这一条我不太懂编辑说的 binary variables（直译是二进制变量）是指什么，因为我去看了期刊命名表里没有 binary variables这样定的分类

2.Discussion. What is missing is a phase of discussion. Firstly, with regard to the results obtained. How do they relate to existing literature? Then, in terms of wider discussion with other articles, trying to better analyse the practical implications of these results. Don't forget that this hybrid approach is always a decision support tool.
请问这个修改意见是需要我加很大一章的Discussion吗，还是加一小节就好呢，因为编辑最后的意见是让我修改，那我在修改这一条的时候是不是不能用太多的篇幅呢？请有经验的各位帮我分析一下吧，多谢了~！ 返回小木虫查看更多