论文审稿意见回来了，一共5个审稿人，意见如下：
Reviewer #1:（修改）
The topic is interesting and of current application in several industrial environments. The References are mostly recent but give credits to previous and remarkable works in this field.
The results show good agreement with numerical models and also improvements regarding previous models.
XXXXXbalabala...
Reviewer #2:（修改和加文献）
This paper needs some revisions:
XXXXXbalabala...
Reviewer #3: 拒审
Reviewer #4: 拒稿
This paper ignores a great many works in XXX; it is a simplified method, only applicable to XXX. It cannot be accepted for the journal publication.
Reviewer #5:录用
The work is novel and will have some useful impact. The article is well written and presented. It is therefore recommended for publication.

想请教一下各位前辈大佬，这种情况录用机会大么？另外这个拒稿的意见怎么回复呢 返回小木虫查看更多