投稿后一个月被拒，编辑回复：
This to inform you that your manuscript was subjected to a peer referee for evaluation. As you will see from the enclosed comments, your manuscript, in its current form, was rejected for publication in our Journal. Refer especially to the Section Editor's file attached. As per our peer referee, the manuscript’s general impression is not corresponding to the journal's guidelines.
Hopefully, if you manage to rewrite the manuscript sufficiently, you are very welcome to submit it again as a new one.

两个审稿人意见不一致，编辑回复如下，感觉态度比较友好，附了带很多修改标记的manuscript，这种情况修改回去有机会么？
Section Editor recommendation:
After receiving two extremely different reviews, I had to study this manuscript carefully.
Unfortunately, I must agree with reviewer 1. In this form, the manuscript is not ready for publication in xx Moreover, the number of issues and shortcomings present in the study is causing the need to thoroughly rewrite the article if the authors want to publish it in xx
The main issues are:
- weak English
- inappropriate usage of references
- the unsuitable level of introduction and discussion paragraphs
All of my comments are in the attached file.
Nevertheless, the presented technique is fascinating, so I am waiting impatiently for the new manuscript. 返回小木虫查看更多