一审稿大修,各位大神给看看,帮忙提一提意见,谢谢!
这是一个审稿人给的4条意见,编辑给了大修,各位大神给看看,帮忙提一提意见,谢谢!
1) The objective, methodology, and results should be better described, discussed and justified
2) The current literature review is not sufficient. For example, please mention (give) following more current studies related to ground heat exchangers and thermal energy storage by PCMs in the sections of Introduction, and References List for completeness of your study and the references:
- Numerical and experimental analysis of a horizontal ground-coupled heat pump system, Building and Environment, 42(3), 1126-1134 (2007).
- Energy and exergy analysis of a ground-coupled heat pump system with two horizontal ground heat exchangers, Building and Environment, 42(10), 3606-3615 (2007).
- Modelling and experimental performance analysis of solar-assisted ground source heat pump system, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 29(1), 1-17 (2017).
- Experimental evaluation of using various renewable energy sources for heating a greenhouse, Energy and Buildings, 65, 340-351 (2013).
- Development of a model compatible with solar assisted cylindrical energy storage tank and variation of stored energy with time for different phase change materials, Energy Conversion and Management, 37(12), 1775-1785 (1996).
- Geometric design of solar-aided latent heat store depending on various parameters and phase change materials, Solar Energy, 62(1), 19-28 (1998).
- Thermal performance of a solar-aided latent heat store used for space heating by heat pump, Solar Energy, 69(1), 15-25 (2000).
3) The results should be expanded significantly and quantitatively.
4) I strongly suggest that authors shall carry out more studies to compare the results from this paper to that from other similar studies.
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
瓷蟾逡饧顾憧梢裕煤冒凑丈蟾逡饧陌桑】赡芨牡糜械阃纯啵谴蟛糠值穆畚腶ccept前不是这样改出来的呢!加油共勉!
,
这个让引用的也是无敌了,几乎全是同一个人的文章。