求助大神,MDPI的materials审稿意见,在线等
如题,各位大神指教,第一次投materials,一路审稿走来,磕磕绊绊,现在有两个审稿意见回来,不知道大家是怎么看出来审稿人的态度的(经常看到有的人说一个接受一个拒稿之类的),我把两个审稿人评价挂出来,大家帮忙看下
审稿人1
Yes Can be improved Must be improved Not applicable
Does the introduction provide sufficient background and include all relevant references? (x) ( ) ( ) ( )
Is the research design appropriate? ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
Are the methods adequately described? ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
Are the results clearly presented? ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
Are the conclusions supported by the results? ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
审稿人2
Yes Can be improved Must be improved Not applicable
Does the introduction provide sufficient background and include all relevant references? ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
Is the research design appropriate? ( ) (x) ( ) ( )
Are the methods adequately described? ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
Are the results clearly presented? ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
Are the conclusions supported by the results? ( ) (x) ( ) ( )
这个是审稿人评价都不高吗?第一个是拒了吗?看他的意见,对结果好像有质疑,第二个整体态度较好,补充几个说明和实验就好了,麻烦大家帮我看下,科研小白在这里谢谢大家了
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
好好改,有希望,既然没拒稿,肯定编辑会针对你作出修改去判断。同时请教下,materials审稿是个什么状态,看得见吗?你需要上传扫描作者声明和所属机构声明吗?
,
接受了吗 最后
这个期刊不是上了预警名单了嘛