请帮我看看这个审稿意见是比较正面的还是负面的
Dear XXX,
Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision.
Reviewer #1: The manuscript addresses interactions of phosphorus and the zeolite/binder composites. In general agreeing that the literature lacks such types of studies shedding light on shaped catalyst bodies, it seems appropriate to point our few shortcoming of the work, which should be considered during the revision process.
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
编辑是模板套话，审稿人1的评价很不错。按要求改，基本就中了
谢谢！借您吉言
，
第一位评审对你的文稿有相当正面的回馈，表示你的研究有处理前人所未尽的地方。但可能会需要你在修改阶段强调这个部分（磷与沸石/结合剂间的作用，这种研究在之前的文献之中较少被讨论到）让催化剂成型体的领域有更进一步的突破。
“You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript”编辑的用词很温和，认真校正就没有问题了
挺好的，discussion补充一些limitations，大概率是major revisions