SPL-Immediate Reject 不知还有重投的意义吗?
投了一篇SPL,收到了Immediate Reject:
The submitted manuscript was reviewed by our editorial board to determine whether it meets the standards of this journal in terms of scope, presentation and technical depth. Please note that only the submissions which pass the preliminary review are scheduled for a full peer review. Regretfully, the review concluded that the paper is not suitable for publication in IEEE Signal Processing Letters due to poor quality of writing in English. This means that the prescreening found frequent grammatical mistakes and odd sentence constructions.
Note that while this is the primary reason for the recommendation, the prescreening may have found other deficiencies.
Some specific comments from the editorial board members are below:
----------------------------
The content of the manuscript is fitting and very promising for SPL but the presentation has issues. The language needs fixing to improve clarity for a general audience (especially since papers in our journal are only lightly edited by publication staff after acceptance). For example, the phrase “*************.’’ is not a sentence. It would be more appropriate to say, “##########.”
不知投过的虫友,这样还有重投的意义吗?letter文合适的期刊不多,有其他适合的期刊推荐吗?
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
WCL
都没送审,没必要在这个期刊折腾了
祝福
语言问题而已,编辑对内容还是认可的。可以考虑找个润色公司修改一下语言然后重新投,记得在cover letter里说明下已经经过润色了,