Access重投被拒
Access一审重投后一个审稿人同意了，另外一个因为这些原因又把我拒了，大家怎么看，继续投吗，这个审稿人是不是就是不喜欢，再次把我拒了，愁。
Reviewer: 1
Recommendation: Reject (updates required before resubmission)
Comments:
Some final cosmetic comments:
* Avoid using first person.
* Avoid using abbreviations and acronyms in title, abstract, headings and highlights.
* Please avoid having heading after heading with nothing in between, either merge your headings or provide a small paragraph in between.
* Abstract is too short. Abstract should have one sentence per each: context and background, motivation, hypothesis, methods, results, conclusions.
* The first time you use an acronym in the text, please write the full name and the acronym in parenthesis. Do not use acronyms in the title, abstract, chapter headings and highlights.
* The results should be further elaborated to show how they could be used for the real applications.
* The originality of the paper needs to be further clarified.
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
1. 格式 2. 语法 3. 摘要写得不令他满意 4. 质疑你论文的创新性 5. 仿真结果的实时应用？
这期刊没有大修小修之类的，拒稿重投相当于大修
茨慊旒Ｐ∧境嬲饷淳貌挥Ω檬切“装。巧蟾迦硕阅懵畚男醋魈岢稣庋奈侍饽愫孟裥枰伎甲陨淼奈侍猓柯畚男吹氖遣皇枪诓盍耍蚨荒鼙泶锍瞿懵畚南氡泶锏亩鳎�
嗯嗯
审稿意见中大部分问题，好像主要是出于你写作的问题啊，还有像一些“格式”问题是不应出那么多的。楼主加油哦！
IEEE Access重投被拒后就不能再投IEEE Access了
祝福