当前位置: 首页 > 论文投稿 >返修意见看不懂,求助各位,非常急!!!!!

返修意见看不懂,求助各位,非常急!!!!!

作者 gengjusha
来源: 小木虫 350 7 举报帖子
+关注

各位大神好!!!
    收到了        JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE返修邮件,其中审稿人对文章做了很多修改意见,如下列表。其中5.     Results and discussion:i.     Results obtained have not been thoroughly explained in line with previous study. This should be done to help show the extent of contribution to knowledge by the current study.我有点看不懂,不知道怎么回答,是不是比较一下我的工作和别人的工作,列个表在支撑文献???
但是翻译出来的结果是:尚未根据先前的研究对得到的结果进行彻底的解释。应该这样做以帮助显示当前研究对知识的贡献程度。看不懂,求教各位大神
Reviewer #1:
Reviewer No.1 Report.
Manuscript Number: JCIS-20-4021
Title: The fabrication of layered Fe2P -Cd0.5Zn0.5S nanoparticles with a reverse heterojunction toward enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution

A.     General Comments.
The paper looked at the development of a two-dimensional (2D) layered Fe2P modified Cd0.5Zn0.5S (CZS) nanoparticles composites through an environmentally friendly solvothermal method. The manuscript is informative and will be interesting to readers. It however, has some short comings as itemized under specific comments. The English of the manuscript is fair but requires improvement. There was no continuous line numbering in the manuscript, thereby making reading and review difficult.

B.     Specific Comments
1.     Topic: See attached manuscript.
2.     Introduction:
i.     The gap in literature that necessitated the study was not well captured in the introduction. This makes it difficult to appreciate the extent of work done.
ii.     See attached manuscript for details of other corrections
3.     Keywords:  Maximum of five keys is preferable.
4.     Experimental: See attached manuscript for the required corrections
5.     Results and discussion:
i.     Results obtained have not been thoroughly explained in line with previous study. This should be done to help show the extent of contribution to knowledge by the current study.
ii.     The other corrections are written on the attached manuscript.
6.     Conclusion: See attached manuscript.
7.     Acknowledgment: See attached manuscript.

C.     Recommendation
In view of the comments above, I recommend acceptance following a major correction.

Yours sincerely, 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
  • xiongzhuang

    与已有研究发现进行对比,体现你的研究发现价值

  • Owena

    没解释清楚结果,要解释清楚才能体现出文章的价值

  • 张金仲

    解释你论文的突出点,和别的比较

  • Owena

    Owena
    2020-08-19 22:47:05
    3楼
    没解释清楚结果,要解释清楚才能体现出文章的价值 用之前的研究来解释

  • s_reg163

    是不是认为你所做的研究与得出的成果,在论述中,相关的“论据”或者说“理由”还不够很充分呢?

  • refnew

    就是你要做科学,促进领域进步,不能只是数字高没有证据支撑是真的高还是测错了还是挑了好的。

  • bobvan

    Results obtained have not been thoroughly explained in line with previous study. This should be done to help show the extent of contribution to knowledge by the current study.

    现在的结果需要同以前的结果进行对比,清楚解释目前的研究对你的研究领域有什么新的贡献,贡献有多大,

猜你喜欢
下载小木虫APP
与700万科研达人随时交流
  • 二维码
  • IOS
  • 安卓