请大家帮小弟看一下这个审稿意见，有戏吗？

Our impression is that the above-mentioned manuscript might indeed become suitable for publication in Angewandte Chemie. However, the criticism from the referees requires that we defer our final decision until you have considered the remarks and revised your manuscript accordingly.
1. Please rate the importance of the reported results

Reviewer #1: Highly important (top 20%)

Reviewer #2: Highly important (top 20%)

Reviewer #3: Highly important (top 20%)

--------------------

2. Please rate the citation of previous publications

Reviewer #1: Appropriate

Reviewer #2: Appropriate

Reviewer #3: Insufficient

--------------------

3. Please rate the length of the manuscript

Reviewer #1: Concise

Reviewer #2: Concise

Reviewer #3: Concise

--------------------

4. Please rate the verification of hypotheses and conclusions by the presented data

Reviewer #1: Fully consistent

Reviewer #2: Fully consistent

Reviewer #3: Major inconsistencies

--------------------

5. Please indicate which other journal you consider more appropriate

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: (No Response) 返回小木虫查看更多