当前位置: 首页 > 论文投稿 >帮忙看看journal of agricultural and food chemistry二修意见

帮忙看看journal of agricultural and food chemistry二修意见

作者 tingting1204
来源: 小木虫 450 9 举报帖子
+关注

journal of agricultural and food chemistry一审意见是大修,修回当天主编对我的手稿进行了查重(意味着并没有返给审稿人看),20天后(不知道审稿人是否同意修改意见),主编给了第二次修改机会,邮件如下:
ACS Publications uses CrossCheck's iThenticate software to detect instances of similarity in submitted manuscripts. In publishing only original research, ACS is committed to deterring plagiarism, including self-plagiarism. Your submitted manuscript appears to contain substantial overlap with published online information and articles (39% see attachment). It is ACS's policy to keep the Similarity Index below 30%.  At this time, we would like to encourage you and your co-authors to make the necessary edits to your manuscript to bring the similarity below 30% and resubmit.

Please include an updated Author Response to Reviewers file as well.

To revise your manuscript, log into ACS Paragon Plus with your ACS ID at https://paragonplus.acs.org/login and select "My Authoring Activity". There you will find your manuscript title listed under "Revisions and Resubmissions Requested by Editorial Office." Your original files are available to you when you upload your revised manuscript. If you are replacing files, please remove the old version of the file from the manuscript before uploading the new file.

第一段是让降低重复率至30%以下。
第二段“Please include an updated Author Response to Reviewers file as well.”是什么意思呢?我也不确定一审的修回稿是否被认可?我应该怎么回复呢? 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
  • bobvan

    在Cover letter 或 Response letter 中回复已经降重了,另外,将原来的 RESPONSE letter 提交,并将降重及原来按审稿人意见修改后的手稿中修改部分高亮,

  • 英论阁cn

    修改之后标记自己更动的部分,如果因为降重有更动到文章结构则必须要特别指明与原文论述不一样的地方,是否会对研究的逻辑造成影响。

猜你喜欢