IEEE access审稿意见求助
求助下,第一次投稿,想问下遇到这种投稿意见该怎么回复啊.....让我修改整篇文章.....
Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:
Reviewer: 1
Recommendation: Reject (update and resubmit encouraged)
Comments:
Authors proposed a very long baseline interferometry method base on uplink signal. I think the idea to use uplink signal is interesting. However, the organization of this manuscript is not good. Authors should make a compact manuscript including the important and necessary points of their study. This manuscript should be rewritten completely.
Additional Questions:
Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: unknown
Is the paper technically sound?: unknown
Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: No.
Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: No.
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
那就缩短篇幅,紧凑一些?
有戏,好好改可以录用。
嗯,我再重新改改,修改下语法,调整下重点啥的
,
谢您吉言
谢您吉言
这期刊如果逻辑没有大漏洞,都可以录用
审稿专家的意思是作者写的有些分散,主题没有突出。