求各位大神康康,论文大修,前三条小建议看不太懂
第一篇sci论文,目前大修,但是有几条审稿人意见摸不着头脑,求各位大神集思广益,小弟在这跪谢了
1. Comnment: The size of the dataset is big enough: however, the data analysis itself should be redone by the authors
2. Comnnent: The main shortage of the manuscript is that the authors do not provide evidence about the effect of the treatments
3. Comment: Moreover, because they measured fiunctional parameters repeatedly during plant growth-period. they should use repeated statistical analvsis. too.
再次跪谢各位大神!!
图片是我的数据分析的描述
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
很好懂啊,按照改啊
大神,能具体说一下吗?我文章数据分析只用了单因素(ANOVA)方差设计,其他的都没有用;他说让我重新分析是啥意思?还有评论第三条说重复的统计分析具体指什么啊?麻烦大神啦,非常感谢
,
不要沉啊啊啊
祝福