论文大修,AE说要补实验,但审稿人没提,一定要补做实验吗?
请问大家,SCI论文大修一定要补做实验吗?电力电子领域,本人小硕的第一篇论文,投的二区,大修。两个审稿人一人五六个问题,没有提到实验的问题,但AE提到了实验,但是也没有说需要做什么实验。我的原稿中已经做了实验验证过了,而且效果还不错。但是理论部分有点没写好,这次已经认真修改了,也增加了更多的分析。我个人感觉没有什么可以补充的实验,做来做去都是那个样子,波形是一样的。而且审稿人也没有要求补充实验。以下是AE的comments,请各位有经验的前辈,这种情况需要补做实验吗?
Associate Editor
Comments to the Author:
The papers covers an interesting topic.
1. However, the reviewers have pointed out certain discrepancies in the modeling and test results. The work needs added analysis and experimental test verification.
2. There are also several grammatical mistakes that needs attention. Please carefully address the comments of each reviewer and resubmit the revised paper. Thank you.
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
没投过AE,不过我觉得编辑意思是按照审稿人要求进一步分析论证
AE的意见比审稿人更重要吧
审稿人只是建议,最终决定权在编辑手里。要分清楚论文的生死掌握在谁手里。
同电力电子,什么期刊呀?
IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics
脰梅脪陋脢脟脙禄脫脨脝脠脟脨碌脛虏鹿脢碌脩茅碌脛脨猫脪陋拢卢脪貌脦陋脪脩戮颅脳枚鹿媒脢碌脩茅脕脣...脪陋脙麓戮脥脰禄脛脺掳脩脭颅脌麓碌脛脢碌脩茅脰脴脳枚脪禄卤茅
,
求助....自己帮顶