Reviewer #2: The authors have conducted many additional experiments, but still the fundamental research question behind the work remain (this comment was also mentioned in the original review report): Provide also experimental data or modeling results to support that the molecular structure organization of the beads corresponds to that presented in Fig. 6, i.e. what are the results indicating Lbl structure? For the reviewers opinion, the lbl structure is just a hypothesis now, and solid evidence of its existence is lacking.

So, you need to provide your own data to prove Lbl structure of beads.
然后我们采用不同反应时间取样进行扫描电镜和能谱观察元素含量变化的测试。LbL是层层自组装技术。可能是我们没有回答在点子上，从lbl的定义和解释，还有例子都解释了。

Reviewer #2: The authors seem not to understand or are not willing to answer the provided fundamental question regarding to lbl structure. Therefore, I let the editor decide if the work can be accepted or not. I am not willing to consider this manuscript anymore.
结果被拒了。

 返回小木虫查看更多