请教大神们：
投稿MDPI的sustainability，第二天送审，7天后只在系统中看到一个审稿人意见，基本无负面评论，提出了5条修改意见。如下所示：
English language and style
(x) Extensive editing of English language and style required
( ) Moderate English changes required
( ) English language and style are fine/minor spell check required
( ) I don't feel qualified to judge about the English language and style

Yes/Can be improved/Must be improved/Not applicable
Does the introduction provide sufficient background and include all relevant references?
(x)( )( )( )
Is the research design appropriate?
(x)( )( )( )
Are the methods adequately described?
( )( )(x)( )
Are the results clearly presented?
( )( )(x)( )
Are the conclusions supported by the results?
( )(x)( )( )

编辑邮件通知被学术编辑拒稿： Our academic editor thought: Although the paper is interesting, this paper does not have a sustainable approach and is outside the interest of the magazine.

已经和编辑沟通，说拒稿是学术编辑主要决定的，审稿人意见不是很重要，让写邮件发于学术编辑沟通。
学术编辑拒稿的原因到现在我也没想明白。。。。因为文章研究是信息扩散，用到了流行病模型，本身就是在研究信息可持续扩散的问题，可是为什么学术编辑说没有可持续方法呢？？？我在信中也做了研究方法的解释。
我写了申诉信，是否还有希望重投呢？

恳请各位有经验的大神指导！ 返回小木虫查看更多