Dear XX
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXX

Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:

Reviewer: 1

Recommendation: Reject (update and resubmit encouraged)

Comments:
1.1 General Recommendation:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
1.2 Major comments:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Additional Questions:
Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Yes

Is the paper technically sound?: Yes

Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Yes

Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: Yes


Reviewer: 2

Recommendation: Reject (update and resubmit encouraged)

Comments:
The authors requested to go through a detailed literature study.

Additional Questions:
Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Yes. But not up to the standard.

Is the paper technically sound?: No. The author requested to detailed literature study.

Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Yes


以上是审稿邮件返回的信息。我大致看了下Reviewer1说了一些具体的，Reviewer2就没说什么，但是这个邮件附了一个access report.pdf，这个文件打开之后是很多很详细的评审意见。
所以我想请问下大家，有没有遇到过这样情况的。因为ACCESS给的Response-to-Reviewers模板是要具体回复某位评审的，Reviewer2基本没说什么具体意见，不知道怎么回。我猜想access report.pdf应该是这个Reviewer2具体写的，但也没有指明，而且他的问题也很多，在这个文件中他分别对文章三个部分做了提问，每个部分他分成很多小问题点，举个例子，对于实验部分他的提问是如下这样描述的：
Simulation results
·whyxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?
·whyxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?
....
·whyxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?
这样的不知道该如何回答
希望大家帮帮第一篇投论文的小白，谢谢 返回小木虫查看更多