谢谢大家！！！

审稿人说我在introduction部分的讨论有失公允，因为我指出HPLC等方法仪器昂贵，操作复杂，而我使用的荧光检测法的仪器造价更贵，约25000$。
随后我在网上查了一下价格发现，国内的荧光计价格在几万—几十万不等，并没有审稿人说的那么昂贵，我应该如何解释呢？因为不知道审稿人是否为中国人，外国的荧光计普遍是更贵的。另外，我在大量文献中也看到有关HPLC方法仪器昂贵，操作复杂的描述，我可以怎么回复审稿人呢？直接贴出这些文献吗？

这是审稿人的评价：
Introduction: The authors write that other methods are expensive, complex, tedious, time-consuming, and require complex sample pretreatment or need expensive equipment.  I do not agree.  The other methods (HPLC or chemiluminescence) are simple and inexpensive. These methods are not "sophisticated" but can be routinely performed by technicians.  Also, they do not require a complex nanomaterial to be prepared. Fluorometry is particularly expensive, in contrast.  Fluorometers do not come for less than 25,000 $ and require substantial operational skills.  The authors should discuss existing methods in a more balanced way.

这是我的论文：
Many detection methods are sensitive and specific, like high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)， liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)，ultra-fast liquid chromatography and photodiode array detection ，and chemiluminescence (CL) . But they are expensive, time-consuming, and demand well-trained operators and complex pretreatment. All these negative characters limit their application. Therefore, a fast, low-cost and approachable method is vital for food quality and market surveillance. 返回小木虫查看更多