当前位置: 首页 > 论文投稿 >Engineering failure analysis论文该不该询问进度?请大家帮忙分析!

Engineering failure analysis论文该不该询问进度?请大家帮忙分析!

作者 d00x_sun
来源: 小木虫 400 8 举报帖子
+关注

今天四月份将论文投到engineering failure analysis,返回审稿意见后只有一位审稿人,给出的四条意见看不出好坏,编辑让修改,也没说大修小修。仔细修改后改回修改稿,然后状态一直是with editor,至今已经五十多天,不知道要不要发邮件催稿。发了怕被拒,不发又着急。求大家帮忙分析一下我的这个情况该怎么办?
PS:处理我的稿件的编辑应该是主编Rechard Clegg,听说是澳大利亚昆士兰科技大学的一个教授,是主编最近太忙吗?
这是当时的编辑意见:
Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Engineering Failure Analysis.
I have completed my evaluation of your manuscript. The reviewers recommend reconsideration of your manuscript following revision. I invite you to resubmit your manuscript after addressing the comments below.
When revising your manuscript, please consider all issues mentioned in the reviewers' comments carefully: please outline in a cover letter every change made in response to their comments and provide suitable rebuttals for any comments not addressed. Please note that your revised submission may need to be re-reviewed. 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
猜你喜欢