投稿Materials Letters以后，半个月后审稿人（只有1个）拒稿，理由：作为一篇letters 缺少创新性，让改成正常的article然后重投其他期刊
编辑的意见是：I do think the manuscript will be suitable for publication in the journal "Materials Today Communications".
Based on my recommendation and the comments received, I expect that the Editors of "Materials Today Communications" will accept the article for publication without further peer-review, so long as the reviewer comments included at the bottom of this email are addressed.

请问这个accept the article for publication without further peer-review 概率有多大？个人感觉这个审稿人的这个关于创新性不足的问题感觉很难回答。
有必要进行article transfer吗？如果转投期刊的编辑对答案不满，是直接拒稿还是重新进入审稿流程呢？ 返回小木虫查看更多