之前投的physica scripta，审稿结束后收到回复。
We regret to inform you that your Paper is not suitable for publication in Physica Scripta in its current form. The changes requested by the referees are substantial and are too significant to warrant a revision of the article in its current form. However, the referee(s) feel that if you rewrite the article as explained in the referee reports, including any further work recommended, it may then be suitable for reconsideration.

If you wish to rewrite your Paper, please take the referee comments fully into account and provide point-by-point responses with a full list of changes. We will treat the rewritten article as a new submission with a new article reference number and it will be peer reviewed again. ?Although we will go back to the previous referees for their opinion where possible, we may also contact further referees in order to ensure that the rewritten article meets our high quality and interest criteria. If it does not, the new version of the manuscript will be rejected.
然后有两个审稿意见，第一个审稿人提了9条，基本都是说英语问题，和物理语言表达问题。
审稿人1:
The idea and the results are mildly interesting.But the paper is very poorly written: I had
difficulty following the main message and understanding what was actually done. Both the
science and English are of a beginning PhD student level. I recommend rejection with
encouragement for resubmission.
审稿人2只给了一段话。
审稿人2:
The paper is well written and the discussions are clear. Even though it is not something that is of significance in terms of moving the field of DEM simulation, it is a good applied engineering problem using well established DEM techniques and would definitely be useful to a broader audience.
有没有大神帮忙看一下啊，这是当前官网的状态，跪等大神

 返回小木虫查看更多