请问投稿后，编辑回复这些内容A clear verifiable scientific reference to the traditional use is missing. E.g. mentioning that some traditional healers make such claims, or just saying that it is a well known traditional medicine is not sufficient. Moreover that a plant is used medicinally is also not sufficient, the effect studied should be clearly related to the traditional use. Just mentioning an anecdotal report is not sufficient either, there must be a clear published scientific observation obtained in a study following (inter)nationally accepted rules, as publishing such observations may interfere with the IP rights of the indigenous people. 我应该怎么改啊，好长时间了都没有改明白，想麻烦您指点一下
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
跟其他杂志一样，没什么区别。
请问投稿后，编辑回复这些内容A clear verifiable scientific reference to the traditional use is missing. E.g. mentioning that some traditional healers make such claims, or just saying that it is a well known traditional medicine is not sufficient. Moreover that a plant is used medicinally is also not sufficient, the effect studied should be clearly related to the traditional use. Just mentioning an anecdotal report is not sufficient either, there must be a clear published scientific observation obtained in a study following (inter)nationally accepted rules, as publishing such observations may interfere with the IP rights of the indigenous people. 我应该怎么改啊，好长时间了都没有改明白，想麻烦您指点一下
，