For the most part, the authors made the attempt to respond appropriately to my comments and suggestions. They seem to have missed one of my minor suggestions that they be more nuanced and avoid statements like "the uncertainty does not meet the accuracy expectations of ESA", which implies that the model output described in the paper would absolute truth which is not the case.
划线的句子是什么意思啊？谷歌翻译的结果是“他们似乎错过了我的一个小建议，即他们会更加细致入微，并避免诸如“不确定性不符合ESA的准确性期望”之类的陈述，这意味着本文所描述的模型输出绝对不是真实情况。”有道翻译的结果是“它们似乎忽略了我的一个小建议，即它们更加细致，避免诸如“不确定性不符合欧空局的准确性期望”之类的说法，这意味着本文所述的模型产出将是绝对正确的，而事实并非如此。”
不太理解这句话的意思，感觉意见挺尖锐的，应该如何回复啊？投的OE，经过漫长的等待后终于给完成二审了，看到这条审稿意见后有点恐慌，只好来求助各位虫友们。 返回小木虫查看更多