某篇三区论文，四个专家基本同意了，学术编辑给了点意见
第一轮审稿 学术编辑的意见：
- The contribution/motivation is not clear,
- The bibliography should be updated. First for the *** topic, see for example:【给的几篇论文】
The bibliography should be also updated for the fuzzy fields, to give the
readers more overview the following should be helpfull: 【给的几篇文献】
- The english should be polished.
第二轮审稿 学术编辑的意见
authors didn't answer all my comments/suggestions, particularly the bibliography is not updated !These references are essential for the paper
and to give the readers more overview.
我看了一下他给的几篇论文，真还都是他的。。。第一轮我没太明白什么意思，以为是我参考文献格式之类的有问题，结果第二轮他又提这个事。意思是让我把这几篇文章都引上吗？
大佬们给点意见呗 返回小木虫查看更多