We have received the reports from our advisors on your manuscript, "Robust Noise-reducing and Edge-determining Methods for ROI Extraction in Finger Vein Recognition".
With regret, I must inform you that, based on the advice received, the Editor has decided that your manuscript cannot be accepted for publication in MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS.
Attached, please find the reviewer comments for your perusal.
I would like to thank you very much for forwarding your manuscript to us for consideration and wish you every success in finding an alternative place of publication.
With kind regards,
The Editorial Office
MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS
Comments for the Author:
Due to the similarity alert by the plagiarism checker, this paper may be removed from the publication system,
可以再试试,但要说明原因
We have received the reports from our advisors on your manuscript, "Robust Noise-reducing and Edge-determining Methods for ROI Extraction in Finger Vein Recognition".
With regret, I must inform you that, based on the advice received, the Editor has decided that your manuscript cannot be accepted for publication in MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS.
Attached, please find the reviewer comments for your perusal.
I would like to thank you very much for forwarding your manuscript to us for consideration and wish you every success in finding an alternative place of publication.
With kind regards,
The Editorial Office
MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS
Comments for the Author:
Due to the similarity alert by the plagiarism checker, this paper may be removed from the publication system,
刚刚有个人告诉我说,拒稿分为直接拒稿和拒稿重投,前者不会受理,后者会再分配审稿人,我这种情况是不是属于前者了
9%的重复率不高呀,为啥拒稿?
不知道,我也很纳闷,自己设想了一种情况,可能是文章太水,编辑不愿意看了,然后就说查重不过关,直接就拒了。但是现在不知道还能不能重新投
9%足够了,单篇重复率最大的是多少