Biosensors and Bioelectronics 编辑说了十几个问题的建议
求Biosensors and Bioelectronics 投稿,咨询编辑的意思?
文章Revised ,一直强调格式不对,求Word模板,编辑一下给了19个问题,看了就头大了,难道要一一回复?
Editors' report:
An "X" has been placed before the paragraph that you need to take into consideration.
1. Review Articles should present a thorough and comprehensive overview of the chosen subject and be extensively referenced and comprise around 8000 words. Authors are expected to go beyond a simple compilation of references and analyse trends, shortcomings and accomplishments in their chosen field, charting possible future directions of the research. Illustrations and summary tables are encouraged. Flexibility of presentation is permitted, but authors are urged to arrange the subject matter clearly under the general headings of Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Main text (The heading and the sub-headings of the main text are left to author's discretion), Summary and Conclusions, Future Perspectives, Acknowledgements, References.
2. Full papers should be complete descriptions of full investigations comprising around 5000 words with up to 6 single figures/tables/schemes in total, but your manuscript is too long or comprises too many figures/tables/schemes. You could use the supplemental information feature for extra figures/tables/. Supplementary files supplied will be published online alongside the electronic version of your article in Elsevier Science web products, but will not appear in the printed issue. You can find the details at https://ees.elsevier.com/bios/
3. We would consider your revised manuscript for publication as a Short Communication. It should be complete descriptions of original limited investigations comprising around 3000 words with up to three single figures/tables/schemes. Alternatively, you could use the supplemental information feature for extra figures/tables/schemes. Supplementary files supplied will be published online alongside the electronic version of your article in Elsevier Science web products, but will not appear in the printed issue. You can find the details at https://ees.elsevier.com/bios/
4. Most referees still prefer to read hard copy when they review your manuscript. In order to aid referees in printing you are strongly recommended to make your manuscript text compact and to check that it will print out in a convenient format.
5. Please rewrite the Abstract. In general, the abstract is a condensation of the information (facts) in the paper (150-250 words) and should present briefly and clearly the methods of the research and the principal results.
6. A maximum of six keywords should be given below the Abstract to describe the contents of the paper.
7. The Results and Discussion section needs to be expanded. The Results and Discussion should deals with the interpretation of the results in the light of previously published findings and must be clearly presented.
8. Please add the Conclusions section. It must be fully supported by the results reported and should include the major conclusions, the limitations of the work and the future work.
9. Please rewrite the Conclusions.
9.1 The Conclusions section is too long. It should be kept short and must be fully supported by the results reported.
9.2 The Conclusions section is not sound. It should include the major conclusions, the limitations of the work and the future work.
10. Please do not place a list of abbreviations in the text. Do not use an abbreviation without explaining it beforehand. The first time the word/phrase is introduced, put the abbreviation in brackets after the word/phrase.
11. In order to demonstrate the repeatability/reproducibility of the method authors are asked to include Error Bars in figures, and relative standard deviations (RSD) or coefficient of variation (CV) in the figures captions or in the text.
12. In order to demonstrate the repeatability/reproducibility of the method authors are asked to include relative standard deviations (RSD) or coefficient of variation (CV) in Tables.
13. We strongly suggest you to find a native English speaker to check your manuscript.
14. Please number the headings and sub-headings of the manuscript.
15. The format of the paper is incorrect. Please correct it according to the instructions of the Guide for Authors of Biosensors and Bioelectronics at https://ees.elsevier.com/bios/.
16. The format of references is incorrect. Please correct it according to the instructions of the Guide for Authors of Biosensors and Bioelectronics at https://ees.elsevier.com/bios/. Please note it is not necessary to add the title of the publications in the list of references.
17. Please delete the title of the publications in the list of references.
18. In order for the publisher to edit your paper the article must be saved in the native format of the word processor used, e.g., Word Perfect, Microsoft Word, etc.
19. All the figures/tables/schemes with captions should be inserted in the text where the authors want.
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
不一一回复的话就坐等拒搞。
首先格式问题应该是你文章最大的问题,格式的整体编排,reference格式等等。其次是太长,不好听一点就是太啰嗦,要么精简,要么灵活运用supplemental information。缩写第一次使用必须跟在全称后面,这些基本的东西都要做好。 主编辑这还没有分发给下面的评审,想要发表必须把每个问题认真回答,具体的回答
,
编辑费这么大劲写这么多,可以看出他认为问题很多,写这些自然花费精力良多,比较恼火。你如果不诚惶诚恐好好回复,不是认真做科研的态度,也不是应有的待人之道
编辑费这么大劲写这么多,可以看出他认为问题很多,写这些自然花费精力良多,比较恼火。你如果不诚惶诚恐好好回复,不是认真做科研的态度,也不是应有的待人之道
意见我基本读完了,问题很大,你文章的篇幅,图,摘要,结论,全文,引用文献,都不行,需要重新搞。文章的语言不行,需要润色,问题不少,但很中肯,要是我的话,就一条一条认真改。
只看前面有X的条款就可以了,没有X的就不用看了,要是全部没标X就是编辑没有问题,在respresponse里礼貌回复一句没有发现有X的情况出现就可以了