审稿专家的审稿意见不明白,求大神帮看
2. the entire experimental section is missing, but the manuscript reports results obtained from experiments. in this form the results cannot be interpreted and verified without the detailed description of the experimental work. it is essential in the manuscript, because the topic is not the most common thermal analysis. (instrument, sample mass, purge gas... etc. should be specified.) the authors had to read few jtac papers for ideas.
3
the reader do not know much about the thermal program used in the experiments. this must be provided carefully before publication.
sci审稿人说我缺实验部分,可是我写了实验,就像国内期刊要求的一样,第三条我没没弄懂啥意思,有大神指点一下的吗
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
是让你把实验部分写详细具体,要让读者看得懂
,
祝福