投了MDPI旗下的sensors，20多天后一审三个专家，其评价如下，编辑给了大修：

Reviewer 1:
Yes        Can be improved        Must be improved        Not applicable
Does the introduction provide sufficient background and include all relevant references?        ( )        (x)        ( )        ( )
Is the research design appropriate?        (x)        ( )        ( )        ( )
Are the methods adequately described?        ( )        (x)        ( )        ( )
Are the results clearly presented?        ( )        (x)        ( )        ( )
Are the conclusions supported by the results?        (x)        ( )        ( )        ( )

Reviewer 2:
Yes        Can be improved        Must be improved        Not applicable
Does the introduction provide sufficient background and include all relevant references?        (x)        ( )        ( )        ( )
Is the research design appropriate?        ( )        (x)        ( )        ( )
Are the methods adequately described?        (x)        ( )        ( )        ( )
Are the results clearly presented?        ( )        (x)        ( )        ( )
Are the conclusions supported by the results?        (x)        ( )        ( )        ( )

Reviewer 3:
Yes        Can be improved        Must be improved        Not applicable
Does the introduction provide sufficient background and include all relevant references?        ( )        (x)        ( )        ( )
Is the research design appropriate?        (x)        ( )        ( )        ( )
Are the methods adequately described?        ( )        ( )        (x)        ( )
Are the results clearly presented?        ( )        ( )        (x)        ( )
Are the conclusions supported by the results?        ( )        (x)        ( )        ( )

给了十天时间修改，我按照审稿人意见一条条修改，三个审稿人基本没有涉及论文内容的问题，主要是一些行文方面的问题，修改还比较顺利，期间还在MDPI进行了润色，十天后如期交了上去。

接下来一直是revised version review，这个状态一直持续了两周，今天状态突然变成了Pending Editor Decision，并且round2中只有一个专家的意见，其他两个专家意见没显示，那个专家意见如下：
（前面完全复制了我的Abstract）Overall, the paper presents a reasonable scientific contribution. The paper is well-written, and the ideas are properly presented. Moreover, the suggested revisions have been properly incorporated.

于是我向助理编辑发了封邮件问了一下，助理编辑回复如下：

Dear Mr. XX,

Thanks for your kind message. As we didn't receive Reviewer 3' reply for
long time, to process your manuscript efficiently, we have sent the
revised manuscript file, the referees' comments, your response to
academic editor to check them. Once we receive academic editor's
response, we will send it back to you as soon as possible.

Kind regards,
XXX

第三个专家（也就是评价最低的专家）好像失联了，审稿结果一直没回来，现在交给学术编辑处理。
请问有没有虫友遇到过这种情况？这种情况还有戏吗。。。。。。 返回小木虫查看更多