文章一审大修，3个审稿人，都提了一些意见，每个审稿人要求引用他们2-3篇文章，又补充了一些内容，这样参考文献增加了10余篇，修改后参考文献51篇。现在二审结果出来了，两个审稿人确定接受，第3个审稿人也确定接受，但觉得参考文献太多了，需要删除一些。现在我们的原则是审稿人要求的参考文献和引用该期刊的参考文献不能删。编辑给的意见是小修后录用，但是给的修改时间和一审大修一样是3个月，之前大修修了20多天返回，返回后二审一个月多一点出的二审结果。这样的情况，大家觉得小修多久修回比较合适呀。下面是编辑和审稿人的意见。

the review process of the above paper has now been completed. based upon the comments of the reviewers, your paper may be accepted for publication in circuits, systems, and signal processing, provided you revise the paper in accordance with the comments of the reviewers (provided below).

please submit your revised paper and your response to the reviewers' comments, by 05 mar 2019.

please note: when uploading your revised files, please make sure only to submit your editable source files (i. e. word, tex).

reviewer #1: it can be accepted.


reviewer #2: the revision is satisfied and the paper can be accepted


reviewer #3: the reference sections the authors cited reference are too many. the authors cite the related references are good. remove unnecessary references. the revision is satisfactory and can be accepted in the present form.

[ Last edited by youandiandhe on 2018-12-17 at 22:01 ] 返回小木虫查看更多