修改稿回复后,副主编决定信给了为何还要送审??
Dear Prof. Dr. *:
We are returning your manuscript "Unidirectional propagation of***", JAP18-AR-03991R, for minor improvements in Figs. 4-6 and the associated discussion.
The scale bar in Figs. 4 and 6 presumably refers to the amplitude of the electric field, and should be labeled as such in the caption. The "max" and "min" of the scale bars would then be explained. At the moment it is not clear whether "max" and "min" refer to field or intensity.
Also, "light energy" is presumably intensity? Finally, make sure that the labels in these figures use a font that is large enough so the labels will remain readable when they are reduced for publication.
When these changes are implemented, we will continue the publication process.
When you respond, please indicate how the manuscript has been revised in your response letter so that the editors can see whether you have complied with the reviewer comments.
The revised manuscript should be returned to the Editor promptly. Your revised manuscript is due 20-Nov-2018. A manuscript returned after 20-Nov-2018 will generally be regarded as new submission and will be assigned a new receipt date.
副主编决定信给了When these changes are implemented, we will continue the publication process
Stage Start Date
Reviewer Assignment Started 29-Oct-2018 11:47:20
Securing Associate Editor 29-Oct-2018 11:47:19
Securing Editor 29-Oct-2018 11:47:19
Submission Check by Editorial Office Completed 29-Oct-2018 11:47:19
Manuscript File Replaced 26-Oct-2018 11:29:18
Submission Check by Editorial Office Started 25-Oct-2018 10:33:07
Securing Editor 25-Oct-2018 10:33:07
Manuscript Submitted to Editorial Office 25-Oct-2018 10:33:05
Waiting for File Conversion 25-Oct-2018 10:14:39
Preliminary Manuscript Data Submitted 25-Oct-2018 10:02:05
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
压根没有送审吧, 是让修改规范后才考虑送审
Reviewer #1 (REMARKS to AUTHOR(s)):
Since the authors have considered my comments to revise the manuscript. I would like to recommand the publication in JAP .
Reviewer #2 (REMARKS to AUTHOR(s)):
I have read carefully the response letter and the revised article and I have no other remarks. The authors have thoroughly considered all my remarks. I am now convinced that the paper is suitable for JAP.
两个审稿人都同意发表,副主编提了一点图的问题和单词问题,怎么又送审呢
,
可能AE走神搞错了。应该不会有什么问题,好事多磨吧
可能是期刊的固定流程,如果责编没有换人,应该不会再次外审了。
让你修改就修改,编辑都说明原因了,你照他的意见修改就成
我也遇到过这种情况,也不知道是怎么回事,主编都给了小修后同意录用的意见,返回去又送外审了,谁知道呢?可能有的期刊就是这样规定的?