如何理解审稿人意见
RT,论文送审回来,问问各位,要如何理解审稿人意思呢?
审稿意见如下:
- Lines 36-40 – In this part of introduction section authors presented short literature review on fuzzy based preference relations. Authors used relevant literature but authors should remove all the lumped references. This is not the practice of Algorithm journal and other relevant scientific journals. This is to prevent inappropriate citation and to provide more information to the authors. If necessary, please provide a short description for each of the reference use.
- Line 40 - Please do not finish the paragraphs with references, for example: "…IVIFPR has been widely adopted and utilized in solving different GDM problems [22, 23, 25, 29-36].
- Line 62-85 - Again, multiple references are of no use for a reader and can substitute even a kind of plagiarism, as sometimes authors are using them without proper studies of all references used. In the case, each reference should be justified by it is used and at least short assessments provided.
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
这么少意见
第36-40行 在导论部分,作者对基于模糊偏好关系的文献综述做了简要介绍。作者使用了相关文献,但作者应该删除所有集中的参考文献。这不是算法期刊和其他相关科学期刊的实践。这是为了防止不恰当的引用,并为作者提供更多的信息。如有需要,请提供每个参考用途的简短说明。
-第40行-请不要用参考文献结束段落,例如:“…IVIFPR已被广泛采用并用于解决不同的GDM问题,
没有对所有参考文献进行适当研究的情况下使用它们,编辑可能认为你参考了太多文献而没有自己的思路,想法和意见
一个观点1-2篇文献支撑即可。多了不好
参考文献的选择要谨慎,不要随便引
要引就引本领域权威期刊的,并且要对观点做简单叙述、总结、表达认同或者反驳,不是往上一放就行的