整个实验耗资不算小，老师跟本人都比较重视，结果也算满意，知足常乐吧
第一次投到angew，两个工作日被拒，主编说字符太长不符合communication要求，应该是编辑不想送审。第二次投jacs两天后分配副编辑，建议转到analytical chemistry。原来想接着投cs，被拒的话再投ac。但是怕不转回头被动，9.8号转到ac，审稿周期据说都是20多天，但是我的一个月还没结果。在10.16号午休的时候，老师说审稿意见回来了，两个小修。两个审稿人都比较nice。
reviewer(s)' comments to author:

reviewer: 1

recommendation: publish either as is or subject to minor revisions as indicated.
additional questions:
significance: top 5% (suitable for analytical chemistry)

originality: top 5% (suitable for analytical chemistry)

broad interest: top 5% (suitable for analytical chemistry)

technical quality: top 5% (suitable for analytical chemistry)

are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: yes

are the references appropriate and correct?: yes

is the english adequate?: yes

is the quality of the figures sufficient?: yes

are the data statistically significant with appropriate controls included?: yes
reviewer: 2

recommendation: publish either as is or subject to minor revisions as indicated.
additional questions:
significance: top 5% (suitable for analytical chemistry)

originality: top 5% (suitable for analytical chemistry)

broad interest: high (suitable for analytical chemistry)

technical quality: high (suitable for analytical chemistry)

are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: yes

are the references appropriate and correct?: yes

is the english adequate?: yes

is the quality of the figures sufficient?: yes

are the data statistically significant with appropriate controls included?: yes

[ last edited by sodatao on 2018-10-25 at 23:57 ]

[ last edited by sodatao on 2018-11-20 at 22:34 ]

[ last edited by sodatao on 2018-11-20 at 22:37 ]

[ last edited by sodatao on 2018-11-20 at 22:43 ]

[ Last edited by sodatao on 2018-11-20 at 22:45 ] 返回小木虫查看更多