其中一个审稿专家意见：The paper contains no experimental work and few comparisons of numerically generated data by the new dynamic model and existing data in free literature.
1.关于轴承动力学方面的。
2.两个审稿专家意见Consider after minor changes，其中一个提了实验的问题。
2.实验本实验室没条件，而且很难实施。
3.国外相关权威文献中没有这方面的研究，国内文献有研究，但期刊级别比较低而且结果都没有试验验证。
所以想请教一下虫友们，怎么回复？
1.        Relevance.
The manuscript presents a multi-body dynamic contact analysis of tribological phenomena inside a TRB with grease lubrication. The....... was used to simulate the role played by various factors (impact load, grease rheological proprieties, temperature) on ....... . The .........is presented as a source of vibration and therefore is carefully analyzed with relevant diagrams and validated with the existent experimentally results obtained by a neutral researcher.
The paper is appropriate for ........l as well as for a Journal in the field of Tribology.
2.        Originality.
In the first part (Introduction) the manuscript presents an up to date view of researches in the field of dynamics of TRB bearings and in the following parts an improved dynamic model containing the latest findings is, step by step, developed.
3.        Quality.
a.        The title and abstract describe adequately paper’s content.
b.        Significant related works are correctly referenced.
c.        The equations, most of them from the field of tribology, have been correctly derived.
d.        The figures are clearly drawn and effectively illustrate the data presented.
e.        The paper contains no experimental work and few comparisons of numerically generated data by the new dynamic model and existing data in free literature.
f.        The conclusions point out, shortly and qualitatively, the main findings of the paper. 返回小木虫查看更多