第一次投论文被拒,麻烦大家帮我看下审稿人意见吧
上个月刚给ksii投了一篇论文,是深度学习方面的,然而今天收到了拒稿,我列出两个审稿人的意见,麻烦大家帮我看一下,这是我第一次写论文,这样被拒了投其他的期刊还有希望吗,若有人能推荐相应的期刊就更谢谢啦
Reviewer: 1
Comments to the Author
1) Please order the keywords. 关键词我提交的时候就有,我不太懂为什么又让提交
2) If you are able to show an example of human activity in the experiment, then this article will be better.
3) Please enrich the references.
Reviewer: 2
Comments to the Author
This paper proposes a convolutional neural network to recognize human activities. The following issues should be considered:
1. Please explain the contributions more clearly. The current contribution is the design of the methods. However, this paper does not explain why the proposed methods can solve the problem that other related works did not solve.
2. The two proposed methods are too heuristic. A strong theoretical basis is necessary.
3. The performance improvement of the proposed methods given in Section 4 is not noticeable. Some novel methods should be proposed to solve problems.
第二个审稿人在第三条意见中否定了我的工作,是嫌我的创新性不够吗,但是第一个审稿人没有提出创新性的问题啊,应该怎么办啊
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
可能是关键词顺序不太对
0.2是有一点低,但是我就不同数量的数据对精度的影响与传统的cnn进行了对比,结果证明我的方法精度一直比传统cnn精度高,我会根据您的意见添加传统方法对比,还有我想问下10折交叉验证怎样做混淆矩阵啊,是10次的结果取平均值还是取最后一次啊,我在stackoverflow上看了但是没有确定的答案
还有这个期刊是sci四区,我是应该改投ei吗,还是再找sci影响因子更低的啊,请问您有推荐的吗,谢谢大神啦
,
原来关键词还有顺序啊,谢谢大神,我改改去
我咋觉得审稿意见都还好呀
这个是多少分的杂志?
但是被拒了,都不让修改,
同学一般这样的意见是直接拒绝吗