投稿到ieee ，AE最终给的意见是大修，但没有具体的审稿意见，怎么改？
审稿人审稿意见具体情况如下：
一个审稿人建议投另外一个期刊；
Referee: 1
Additional Questions:
1. Subject matter appropriate to scope of TPS?: No

2. Sufficient new technical/physics advances (original work)?: Yes

3. Proper context with related work / adequate references? *: Yes

4. Appropriate quality of presentation? **: No

5. Suitable title?: Yes

6. Adequate abstract?: Yes

7. Should manuscript be shortened?: No

8. Clear figures with captions?: No

9. English satisfactory? ***: Yes
Overall rating of paper:

另一各审稿人：Mandatory revisions required。
Additional Questions:
1. Subject matter appropriate to scope of TPS?: Yes

2. Sufficient new technical/physics advances (original work)?: Yes

3. Proper context with related work / adequate references? *: No

4. Appropriate quality of presentation? **: Yes

5. Suitable title?: Yes

6. Adequate abstract?: Yes

7. Should manuscript be shortened?: No

8. Clear figures with captions?: Yes

9. English satisfactory? ***: No

Overall rating of paper: Good 返回小木虫查看更多