说文章的新颖性不够,编辑给的大修。新颖性不够怎么回复呢
下面是第二个审稿人的意见:
In this article, the authors designed a system to realize the generation of EPOV and EPVB based on the polarization states of the incident wave. The output phase can be well modulated by the Q-plate and the SLM. In general, there are no technical problems in this manuscript. However, I am a little worried about the novelty of this work.
It seems that this work is just an experimental demonstration of Equation (3) and the experimental results, unsurprisingly, agreed with the theoretical predictions. As the Q-plate and SLM are widely employed to modulate the phase response, at present I cannot see much improvement that this article can make to this research field both theoretically and technically. The authors may need to illustrate the advantages of their work further.
对此,我很无奈不知道怎么去回答?老师让我自己先想想,可是第一次投没啥经验,希望大佬们能帮忙支个招。怎么去回复呢?
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
论证一下,还是有一定创新性的,虽然不足,但是足够发表的这种,尽量不否定别人的评论
,
你需要和别人的结果做对比,在有争议的地方提出自己的解释和判断
我感觉就是典型的自己做自己的,没跟别人作比较