如题，6.11投稿，7.19被拒，两个审稿人，一个小修，一个拒稿（没有明确理由），具体如下：
Reviewer: 1

Recommendation: Reconsider after major revisions.

Comments:
This manuscript reports new epoxy (EP)-based molecular composites with sulfonated aromatic polyamides,poly(p-sulfophenylene terephthalamide) (sPPTA) and poly(benzidine-2,2'-disulfonic acid terephthamide) (PBDT), as the reinforcement, which disperse uniformly in epoxy, but do not show liquid crystalline structure. It is very interesting and the paper is well designed. The mechanical properties is significantly enhanced. However, before acceptance, minor revisions are needed.
1. Fig. 1. the legend is lost.
2. NMR is suggested to prove the reaction in the scheme 1,
3. The mechanical performances decreased when the sPPTA and the PBDT were more than 6%. Please explain the reason.
4. As the properties were decreasd when the the sPPTA and the PBDT were more than 6%, please give the SEM figure to explain this phenomenon.
5. The following paper can be referred to support your study;1) Composites Part B: Engineering, 2017, 114: 111-120.


Additional Questions:
Do these findings represent a significant advance in the polymer field?: Yes

Please rate the overall quality and clarity of the manuscript: Good

Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: Yes

Is the Supporting Information, if included, technically sound and sufficient to support the findings of the manuscript?: Yes

Would you like to bring this manuscript to the attention of the Editor as a particularly newsworthy or noteworthy manuscript?: Yes


Reviewer: 2

Recommendation: Do not publish. This manuscript is incremental in the field, and offers little if any value to the Macromolecules community

Comments:
Please consider another journal for your manuscript

Additional Questions:
Do these findings represent a significant advance in the polymer field?: No

Please rate the overall quality and clarity of the manuscript: Fair

Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: In part

Is the Supporting Information, if included, technically sound and sufficient to support the findings of the manuscript?: No

Would you like to bring this manuscript to the attention of the Editor as a particularly newsworthy or noteworthy manuscript?: No

考虑是申诉还是转投，希望有经验的朋友能给予一些意见，谢谢啦，临近申请季时间也比较紧，挺焦虑的。 返回小木虫查看更多