Dear Mr. Honghao Zhou,

I am writing to you in regards to manuscript # SPL-24547-2018 entitled "XXXXXX", which you submitted to the IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

The submitted manuscript was reviewed by our editorial board to determine whether it meets the standards of this journal in terms of scope, presentation and technical depth. Please note that only the submissions which pass the preliminary review are scheduled for a full peer review. Regretfully, the review concluded that the paper is not suitable for publication in IEEE Signal Processing Letters due to its limited scope and relevance to signal processing. That assessment is made primarily considering the expertise in our editorial board and their ability to recruit reviewers and gauge the quality of the work you submitted.
Note that while this is the primary reason for the recommendation, the prescreening may have found other deficiencies.
Some specific comments from the editorial board members are below:

-------------------------
This manuscript is much better suited to a computer-vision journal or conference.
-------------------------

Please note that according to IEEE Signal Processing Society policy 6.16 "Handling of Rejected Papers" (https://signalprocessingsociety. ... -procedures-manual), the Society strongly discourages resubmission of rejected manuscripts more than once. Authors should carefully review the aforementioned policy before resubmitting their manuscript.

Thank you for considering the IEEE Signal Processing Letters for the publication of your research.  I hope the outcome of this specific submission will not discourage you from the submission of future manuscripts.

究竟是论文不合适还是太水了故意这么说？
另外，还有什么计算机视觉审稿比较快的期刊或者近期的会议可以推荐以下？
还有，ACML这个会议这么样，我投合适吗，容不容易中？
[/quote] 返回小木虫查看更多