我该怎么回复审稿专家的评语?
This paper is well-written. It is technically strong.
I would like to see the error bars and standard deviations. What is the repeatability of the produced results.
I would also like to suggest the comparison with the water quality guidelines and specification of the leached components to determine whether it will be safe over a longer period of time.
Elemental mapping and point analysis will also assist in determining the fates of pollutants and further validate that leaching has taken
不太理解审稿专家想问什么?好像也不太好回复这些审稿专家的意见。
[ Last edited by ustb2015 on 2018-7-28 at 17:39 ]
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
加误差和标准差之类?...比较...,
这审稿已经相当积极了啊。楼主很厉害,英文论文写的这么棒!提前恭喜啊
还没最终接收呢
能得到论文撰写和技术上都强,不容易!完善一下应该很快接受的。祝福!
你的数据没有重复?起码要3个重复啊,标准差都没有,一个数字有可信度吗?
Elemental mapping and point analysis will also assist in determining the fates of pollutants and further validate that leaching has taken place.
那这个是什么意思呀
,
就加误差棒,排水标准污染物参考数,以及做个EDS表征或者XPS等能够验证元素成分组成的应该就可以了