当前位置: 首页 > 论文投稿 >我该怎么回复审稿专家的评语?

我该怎么回复审稿专家的评语?

作者 ustb2015
来源: 小木虫 350 7 举报帖子
+关注

This paper is well-written. It is technically strong.

I would like to see the error bars and standard deviations. What is the repeatability of the produced results.

I would also like to suggest the comparison with the water quality guidelines and specification of the leached components to determine whether it will be safe over a longer period of time.

Elemental mapping and point analysis will also assist in determining the fates of pollutants and further validate that leaching has taken

不太理解审稿专家想问什么?好像也不太好回复这些审稿专家的意见。

[ Last edited by ustb2015 on 2018-7-28 at 17:39 ] 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
  • vonkamen

    加误差和标准差之类?...比较...,

  • dizzysucceed

    这审稿已经相当积极了啊。楼主很厉害,英文论文写的这么棒!提前恭喜啊

  • ustb2015

    引用回帖:
    3楼: Originally posted by dizzysucceed at 2018-07-03 19:20:54
    这审稿已经相当积极了啊。楼主很厉害,英文论文写的这么棒!提前恭喜啊

    还没最终接收呢

  • mxnjfu

    能得到论文撰写和技术上都强,不容易!完善一下应该很快接受的。祝福!

  • yuer9809

    你的数据没有重复?起码要3个重复啊,标准差都没有,一个数字有可信度吗?

  • ustb2015

    引用回帖:
    6楼: Originally posted by yuer9809 at 2018-07-09 11:15:26
    你的数据没有重复?起码要3个重复啊,标准差都没有,一个数字有可信度吗?

    Elemental mapping and point analysis will also assist in determining the fates of pollutants and further validate that leaching has taken place.
    那这个是什么意思呀

  • 26℃的白开水

    就加误差棒,排水标准污染物参考数,以及做个EDS表征或者XPS等能够验证元素成分组成的应该就可以了

猜你喜欢
下载小木虫APP
与700万科研达人随时交流
  • 二维码
  • IOS
  • 安卓