Reviewer 1                implemented the monitoring method using wireless communication well.you can expect better results if we make the experiment more varied.Reviewer 2                The work described in this paper has potential contribution to the industry to some extent. But this manuscript requires a thorough editing for grammar and readability. Awkward phrasing and errors in tense are pervasive throughout the manuscript. The comments below address some of important practical problems. 1. Line 32, “are” should be “is”2. Line 39, “issues” or “issue”,  please check it.3. Line 274, “was” should be “were”. Reviewer 3                1.This paper does not clearly explain how to handle data transfer in different communication protocols.2.Is there a comparison of RSSI for correction? Which condition does the baseline compare or base on?3.They proposed that both the (ZigBee endpoint and electronic box) are too large. The newly developed ZigBee chip set already has smaller devices.
是因为语法问题吗？改后接受可能大吗

 返回小木虫查看更多