小修意见如何回答
最近文章给了小修,请问各位大神,下面的审稿意见如何回答,感觉都是客观性描述。
1. There are no objective errors in the methords or results, and the conclusions supported by the presented data.
2. Is the English language of sufficient quality?
- Yes
Is the quality of the figures and tables satisfactory?
- Yes
Does the reference list cover the relevant literature adequately and in an unbiased manner?
- Yes
Are the statistical methods valid and correctly applied? (e.g. sample size, choice of test)
- Yes
Are the methods sufficiently documented to allow replication studies?
- Yes
Are the data underlying the study available in either the article, supplement, or deposited in a repository?
- Yes
Does the study adhere to ethical standards including ethics committee approval and consent procedure?
- Not Applicable
Have standard biosecurity and institutional safety procedures been adhered to?
- Not Applicable
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
你所列的不是具体的审稿意见。没有其他评审意见吗?
其它的意见只有一个pdf,里面全是标红的语法错误,别的没有了。但是上面的问题在系统里也要回答,我的回答只有thank you for your comments.但是提交的时候一直提示我没有回答。
I have carefully revised the paper according to your comments made in the PDF file.
可能需要放在一个单独的response to reviewers文件里上传系统
,
这篇文章被录用了吗