大牛们，帮忙分析一下我这个投applied energy，第二次修改后因为一些小的语言错误被拒，有必要在重新投吗？谢谢
以下是回复信。
Applied Energy
Dear Mr. Nan Li,
I regret to inform you that the editors/reviewers of your manuscript have advised against publication, and I must therefore reject it.
For your guidance, the reviewers' comments are included below.
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work.
Please proceed to the following link to update your personal classifications and keywords, if necessary:
https://ees.elsevier.com/apen/l.asp?i=883861&l=BMPM00QQ
Yours sincerely,

J. Yan, PhD
Editor-in-chief
Applied Energy
Editors/Reviewers' comments:
Reviewer #1: The authors have taken all suggestions from this reviewer and made two rounds of revision in accordance.

Reviewer #2: Although the authors have made significant changes to this manuscript, there are still many problems. In the second-round review, it has already been mentioned that there are some words misleading and confused exressions. Some of these errors have not been corrected in the second-round of the authors' modified version. For example, one same province presents a variety of expressions in the manuscript, including "Shaanxi", "Shananxi" and "Shanxi". In addition, some mistakes in the letter case of words in the highlights section have not been resolved. There are obvious differences in the font size of words in some sentences. In short, there are still many non-standard details in the manuscript, which does not meet the requirements of the journal. 返回小木虫查看更多