那些让你感到绝望的审稿意见
论文终于完稿了
可谓皇天不负有心人
想想真是完美无缺
论文发表什么的
简直是轻而易举
仿佛已经看到了铅字版的论文
别做梦了
审稿人什么的最令人讨厌了
他们会让你绝望甚至想自杀
说真的
审稿人提出的
无关紧要且毫无意义的问题和评论
到底意义何在呀
是否想知道审稿人背地里
怎样说你的坏话
是否想体会下审稿人的诙谐与幽默
小博今天带大家见识一下
什么叫毒舌搞笑的审稿意见
什么叫好评如流的审稿意见
毒舌搞笑篇
1. “Done! Difficult task, I don't wish to think about constipation and faecal flora during my holidays! But, once a referee, always and anywhere a referee; we are good boy scouts in the research wilderness. Even under the sun and near a wonderful beach.”
搞定了!太不容易了。我才不想装着一脑子便秘和粪便菌落来度假。但是,一朝做了审稿人,永远都是审稿人,到哪儿都是审稿人。在科学研究的荒漠中,我们是勇敢的童子军。即使在洒满阳光的沙滩上也是。哼!
2. “This paper is desperate. Please reject it completely and then block the author's email ID so they can't use the online system in future.”
这篇论文烂到家了。请彻底拒稿,然后封了作者的账号,免得他日后继续投稿。
3. “The writing and data presentation are so bad that I had to leave work and go home early and then spend time to wonder what life is about.”
写作水平和数据展示让我整个人都不好了,我不得不提前下班,早点回家,甚至开始怀疑人生。
4. “The biggest problem with this manuscript, which has nearly sucked the will to live out of me, is the terrible writing style.”
这篇稿件的写作风格太糟糕了,审得我都不想活了。
5. “The presentation is of a standard that I would reject from an undergraduate student.”
就算回到本科生时期,我都会拒掉这种水平的投稿。
6. “This paper is awfully written. There is no adequate objective and no reasonable conclusion. The literature is quoted at random and not in the context of argument. I have doubts about the methods and whether the effort of data gathering is sufficient to arrive at a useful conclusion.”
这篇论文写得太烂了。目的不明确,结论不合理。引文都是乱引的,跟正文的论证完全对不上号。我怀疑这样的实验方法,也怀疑他们收集的数据不足以得出有效结论。
7. “Season's Greetings! I apologise for my slow response but a roast goose prevented me from answering emails for a few days.”
节日快乐!回复慢了,真抱歉。有一只烤鹅妨碍我,让我几天都没顾得上回邮件。
见识过了审稿人的毒舌和幽默
再来见识一下审稿人怎么夸人
当审稿人遇到非常棒的论文
也会给出衷心的好评
好评点赞篇
1. “There was little I could think of to improve this nice paper.”
这篇论文好得我都不知道要怎么改了。
2. “This is as solid a write up as I have seen, many spend much more time and space to say considerably less. It is a perfect example of a compact report.”
这是我见过的最确凿的报告,许多人花更多时间精力写出来的比这个差多了。作为一篇翔实的报告,这是一个完美的例子。
3. “landmark paper on P. putida physiology.”
假单胞菌生理学研究的里程碑。
4. “It is always a joy to review manuscripts such as this. Well conceived, well executed, well edited. Clean. Pristine. From start to finish.”
评审这样的稿件是件人生乐事:构思周详,实施得当,写得漂亮。干净,纯朴,从头至尾。
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
笑不行了
不期待超级好评语出现在我的手稿中,当然更不期待以上搞笑的评语。尽管搞笑,“喜剧”成分十足,但是一旦出现,对于投稿人来说就是“悲剧”一出!
我的稿件投出去后,直接就被拒稿了,没有任何评论意见,呜呜
外审录用,编委退稿,不知道够不够绝望

无标题2.png
,