The results section should be expanded by adding more results analysis. This paper investigates and finds out which algorithm is better. However, the authors have to explain WHY. There is a big gap between the results and conclusion. There should be the result analysis between these two sections. I can see that the results are significant, but why? After comparing the algorithms, you have to be able to analyse the results and relate them to the structure of each algorithm. It would be interesting to have your thoughts on why the proposed methods performed better at the end of the results section. Please also discuss the reason that why other algorithms did or did not perform well on the test cases. Such analyses would be the core of our work where you prove your understanding of the reason behind the results. You can also link the findings to the hypotheses of the algorithms investigated in results analysis section. I would expect a very deep analysis from differentperspective in the revised draft.

 返回小木虫查看更多