投了一篇期刊,经过两轮修改被拒了,还有必要重投吗?
这是被拒的理由:
Dear Dr. ,
We now have reviewers' comments on the above paper and I regret to inform you that it is not considered suitable for publication in Ironmaking and Steelmaking: Processes, Products and Applications. The reason is explained below and is related to the poor English language as applied.
We are sorry not to be able to write in a more positive way but we should like to thank you for giving us an opportunity to consider your work for publication.
Reviewers' comments:
Reviewer #1: Dear authors,
please send your manuscript to a professional translator or a native speaker to revise the text. The level of English is still not good enough for publication.
In my previous comments I already suggested to improve the English and I gave a few examples of poor English in the text. Unfortunately only the highlighted sentences were improved, but the rest of the text was not revised. For example, I suggested to change "athmosphere pressure" to "atmospheric pressure" at line 14 on page 4. You did follow my suggestion there, but at page 5 line 16 it still says "atmosphere pressure".
Apart from the level of English I am satisfied with the paper.
最后还给推荐了润色服务公司。
请问各位大神还有必要重投吗???
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
为啥第一次不润色彻底,这拒稿好可惜
完全是英语水平的问题,写文章太可惜了。
这也太坑了吧……
活该,修改论文不彻底,这种态度不端正的下次长点心
是个审稿人都会据稿的,因为楼主根本没有用心按审稿意见去提高文章的英语水平,这次算是吃一堑长一智
不过编辑推荐了润色公司,花钱润色一下,再附上润色证明,重投应该还是有机会,
如果我是审稿人,我也会拒。
润色重投吧,因为语言确实太可惜了