Dear Mr. zuo,

We have received the decision on your paper.

For your guidance, please find below the Editor's and the reviewers' comments.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Editor in Chief

given the detailed comments of the reviewers and the recommendation of the Associate Editor,  it is my sad duty to inform you that the paper cannot be accepted  for publication.

Thank you for your interest in INFORMATION SCIENCES.



Associate Editor: The reviewers have commented on your paper. Based on the comments, this paper has to be greatly improved in several aspects, including providing appropriate references, justifying how and why the study is done, etc. As a result, this paper is unable to be considered for publication as its present form. Reviewers' comments are appended below for your reference.



Reviewer #2: The authors are referring to parts of a figure as an example below, but could be modified, therefore, confused with the quote of the figure.
Example:
"Similarly, a figure '0.05108'"
"is their sum assigned a gure '-1'."
"is mass of the three coeficients assigned a figure '1'."

Throughout the paper the equations were not
numerically identified;

Item 5 - Include an introduction between items 5 and 5.1;

Some Figures could be better explained, example:  Figure 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 e 6.

Some figures are causing page break before text ends.

The paper shows important results with the proposed technique, but the text is very tiring and needs to be improved.




Reviewer #3: The paper attempts to show a novel way to create multi-crossover coefficients in a more efficient way. The article is mostly well written although still have some serious problems in grammar in places (as if some sections were not proof read).

The main concern with this paper is the support presented by the authors, specially concerning to the algorithms used for the performance test. Algorithms 1, 2 and 3 seem by observation very inefficient as they allow to accumulate potential out-of bound errors randomly and do not guarantee termination in a defined time. Even their "remedy" algorithm exhibits the same behaviour so the efficiency gain in this aspect is inexistent. Moreover, the references in which all their test rely most heavily ( 返回小木虫查看更多