Reviewers' comments:

EiC: As written, the  paper has limited relevance to our readership. Please better ground the paper in recent papers on future selection  from Pattern Recognition and cognate journals.

The title is rather clumsy and un-grammatical. I suggest you change it to  something like

Class-specific mutual information variation for feature selection.


Also please check the grammar in the paper carefully.


Reviewer #1: Earlier comments have all been well addressed. The authors did a great job. I have no more concern on this paper. Thanks.
----
I agree with Reviewer #1 and have carefully reviewed R1 myself.  The authors have also
done a job with English in revision.  I now recommend its acceptance.

请问题目就是换成编辑给提供的？还是什么意思，还有第一句话能否帮忙解释一下，担心自己理解不准确 返回小木虫查看更多