µÚÒ»´ÎͶÎÄÕ£¬SCI£¬±»¾ÜÁË£¬ÐÞ¸ÄÁË»¹ÄÜÔÙͶÕâ¸öÆÚ¿¯Âð£¿
17Äê9Ô·ÝͶÁËÒ»¸öSCIÆÚ¿¯£¬18Äê1Ô·ݷµ»ØÁËÒâ¼û¡£3¸öÉó¸åÈË£ºÁ½¸ö¾Ü¾ø£¬Ò»¸ö´óÐÞ£¨»ù±¾Ò²ÊǾܾø£©¡£
Èý¸öÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼ûÊÇ£º
Éó¸åÈË1£ºAgainst this background publication is not recommended.
Éó¸åÈË2£ºI would not recommend publication of this paper in its current form.
Éó¸åÈË3£ºThis paper is on the cusp of Major Revision and Reject. In fairness to the authors I feel that Major Revision is the correct decision. This will give them the opportunity to re-structure their paper to provide and make a modest contribution to the literature on the XXX.
Éó¸åÈË3¸øµÄÐÞ¸ÄÒâ¼û×îϸ×î¶à£¬¶øÇÒ¶ÔÎÄÕµÄÄÚÈÝͦ¸ÐÐËȤ¡££¨´Ó»Ø¸´µÄÓïÑÔÉÏÄܹ»¿´³ö£©
±à¼µÄ»ØÐÅÊÇ£º
Dear XXX
I now have three reviews of your paper.
Unfortunately, all three referees said that your paper should not be published in the XXX. I attach the reviews so you can see why your paper has been rejected.
Yours
Õâ¸öÒâ˼Ӧ¸ÃÊǾܾøÁ˰ɡ£
Èç¹ûÎÒ°´ÕÕÉó¸åÈ˸øµÄÐÞ¸ÄÒâ¼ûÐ޸ĺ󣬻¹ÄÜÔÙͶÕâ¸öÆÚ¿¯Âð£¿Èç¹û¿ÉÒԵϰ£¬ÊÇÖØÍ¶»¹ÊÇ·µÐÞµÄͶѽ¡£
µÚÒ»´ÎͶÎÄÕ£¬Çó¸÷λľ³æ´óÉñ´Í½Ì£¡
·µ»ØÐ¡Ä¾³æ²é¿´¸ü¶à
¾©¹«Íø°²±¸ 11010802022153ºÅ
¿ÉÄܲ»ÊʺÏÕâ¸öÔÓÖ¾
×£¸£
×£¸£
ÄãÒªÊǸÄÍêÓкܴóÌáÉý£¬¿ÉÒÔ¿¼ÂÇÖØÍ¶
×îºÃ²»ÒªÕâÑù
ÉÒÔͶ£¬µ«È·Êµ²»ÍƼö£¬ÆðÂëÓÐÒ»¸öÕýÃæÒâ¼û¶øÇÒ·´¶ÔÒâ¼ûÊÇÄãÄܹ»²µ³âµ¹µÄ£¬×îºÃÊǸù¾ÝÒâ¼ûÐÞ¸ÄÔÙͶÆäËüÔÓÖ¾
£¬
ÞDͶ™C•þ´ó
û±ØÒªÔÙͶ´Ë¿¯