当前位置: 首页 > 论文投稿 >有关审稿意见不是很懂,请教大家

有关审稿意见不是很懂,请教大家

作者 jhonben
来源: 小木虫 200 4 举报帖子
+关注

1:the selection of significant digits still needs careful consideration. You are correct to add the standard deviation values to the tables and figures. However, particularly in the table, you need to adjust the number of significant digits reported to reflect the precision of your measurements, where the precision is indicated by the standard deviation.
For example, the first entry in Table 1 is 36.41+/-1.36. Your standard deviation value indicates that the value in the ones position is uncertain. Specifically, your standard deviation value says that the average value for this measurement is somewhere between 35 and 37. Since you cannot confidently conclude what value should be in the ones place (X.0), you certainly can't comment on the values in the tenth and hundreth positions. Thus, this value should be reported as 36+/-1.
表格见下图。他的意思是要把表格中的数字改成没有小数点的?那不是很奇怪?还是制药改文中提到的数据?

2:the text could still need a thorough language wash, paying extra attention to the use of articles, which currently is limited, but should be added in several instances. The use of Oxford comma (serial comma) is also advised to avoid possible misunderstandings

后半句让我用牛津逗号,前半句的意思是改进语言和增加参考文献?这个“articles”在此处是什么意思?

谢谢!

有关审稿意见不是很懂,请教大家
Screen Shot 2017-12-27 at 10.58.29 AM.png 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
  • newslx

    根据他的意思,应该是让你把小数点后面的数值全部删除掉。因为,他觉得标准偏差已经表明你测量值的精确性,也就是介于35-37之间,所以没有必要保留小数点后的值,因为没有什么意义。也就是将表格中所有数据小数点后的数值根据四舍五入的原则删除。
    如果我的理解有误,还望谅解。

  • jhonben

    引用回帖:
    2楼: Originally posted by newslx at 2017-12-27 11:40:56
    根据他的意思,应该是让你把小数点后面的数值全部删除掉。因为,他觉得标准偏差已经表明你测量值的精确性,也就是介于35-37之间,所以没有必要保留小数点后的值,因为没有什么意义。也就是将表格中所有数据小数点后 ...

    我也是这样理解的,但是文献中没看见过直接写整数的

  • 紫凝风

    引用回帖:
    2楼: Originally posted by newslx at 2017-12-27 11:40:56
    根据他的意思,应该是让你把小数点后面的数值全部删除掉。因为,他觉得标准偏差已经表明你测量值的精确性,也就是介于35-37之间,所以没有必要保留小数点后的值,因为没有什么意义。也就是将表格中所有数据小数点后 ...

    想问下,您最后怎么修改的,我也遇到类似问题

猜你喜欢